Price history
Select outcomes to plot.
Description
Rei Sakamoto vs Yibing Wu in Nottingham 2 is scheduled for June 15, 2026 at 5:00 AM ET. Markets resolve based on which player advances, with 50-50 outcomes if the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or delayed beyond seven days without a winner, and with specific rules for retirements, walkovers, or defaults. The primary resolution source will be official ATP Tour information, with credible reporting as a fallback.
Event stats
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
Markets
16
Market highlights
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Related events
Stuttgart Open: Ben Shelton vs Sho ShimabukuroLibema Open: Barbora Krejcikova vs Magda LinetteHSBC Championships: Emma Raducanu vs Kamilla RakhimovaStuttgart Open: Alexander Bublik vs Taylor FritzHSBC Championships: Katie Boulter vs Donna VekicBratislava: Alexander Shevchenko vs Vitaliy SachkoLibema Open: Adrian Mannarino vs Alex de MinaurITF Curtea de Arges: Radu Mihai Papoe vs Alan Fernando Rubio FierrosIlkley: Dane Sweeny vs Toby SamuelLibema Open: Daniil Medvedev vs Marin Cilic
Markets
Rules
This market refers to the tennis match between Rei Sakamoto and Yibing Wu in the Nottingham 2, originally scheduled for June 15, 2026 at 5:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Rei Sakamoto' if Rei Sakamoto advances against Yibing Wu. This market will resolve to 'Yibing Wu' if Yibing Wu advances against Rei Sakamoto. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.