Price history
Select outcomes to plot.
Description
Nottingham 2: Otto Virtanen vs Christopher O'Connell is a scheduled ATP tennis match originally set for June 20, 2026 at 9:00 AM ET. Markets resolve to Otto Virtanen or Christopher O’Connell based on who advances, with 50-50 in cancellations, ties, or unresolved delays beyond seven days. The primary resolution source is ATP Tour announcements, with credible reporting as a fallback.
Event stats
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
Markets
16
Market highlights
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Related events
Halle Open: Daniel Altmaier vs Daniil MedvedevGrass Court Championships: Elina Svitolina vs Alexandra EalaNottingham Open: Ann Li vs Viktorija GolubicParma: Laslo Djere vs Sebastian OfnerFigueira Da Foz: Jeline Vandromme vs Ayla AksuHSBC Championships: Tommy Paul vs Alejandro Davidovich FokinaHalle Open: Frances Tiafoe vs Felix Auger-AliassimeBrescia: Sarah Rakotomanga vs Mayar SherifDublin: Titouan Droguet vs Jurij RodionovParma: Daniel Rincon vs Luca Van Assche
Markets
Rules
This market refers to the tennis match between Otto Virtanen and Christopher O'Connell in the Nottingham 2, originally scheduled for June 20, 2026 at 9:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Otto Virtanen' if Otto Virtanen advances against Christopher O'Connell. This market will resolve to 'Christopher O'Connell' if Christopher O'Connell advances against Otto Virtanen. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.