Price history
Loading price history...
Event stats
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
Markets
14
Market highlights
Top market
Δ 24h gainer
Δ 24h loser
Highest volume
Top market
Δ 24h gainer
Δ 24h loser
Highest volume
Related events
Counter-Strike: NIP vs Liquid (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat III PlayoffsCounter-Strike: 100 Thieves vs Sangal (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat III PlayoffsCounter-Strike: fnatic vs Heroic (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat III PlayoffsCounter-Strike: Aurora Gaming vs 9z (BO3) - Thunderpick World Championship Group ACounter-Strike: Voca vs Phantom (BO1) - Elisa BreakOut Series #2 Group BCounter-Strike: STATE vs TheChampionGG (BO3) - United21 Group BCounter-Strike: Legacy vs BetBoom Team (BO3) - Thunderpick World Championship Group BCounter-Strike: Copenhagen Wolves vs RoundsGG (BO3) - European Pro League Regular PlayoffsCounter-Strike: Voca vs HAVU (BO1) - Elisa BreakOut Series #2 Group BCounter-Strike: Team Nemesis vs Nuclear TigeRES (BO3) - PGL Bucharest Closed Qualifier Playoffs
Markets
Outcome | Odds | Spread | Δ 24h | Δ 7d | Δ 30d | 24h Volume | Total Volume | Liquidity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map 1 Winner | Astralis | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Winner | MIBR | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Match Winner | MIBR | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| O/U 2.5 Games | Over | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map Handicap: AST (-1.5) vs MIBR (+1.5) | MIBR | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Astralis (-3.5) vs MIBR (+3.5) | Astralis | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | Under | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Astralis (-3.5) vs MIBR (+3.5) | MIBR | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: Astralis (-3.5) vs MIBR (+3.5) | MIBR | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: MIBR (-3.5) vs Astralis (+3.5) | Astralis | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map Handicap: MIBR (-1.5) vs Astralis (+1.5) | Astralis | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: MIBR (-3.5) vs Astralis (+3.5) | MIBR | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rules
This market refers to the Counter-Strike Quarterfinal 3 match between Astralis and MIBR in the Stake Pulse Beat III Playoffs, initially scheduled for October 16, 2026 at 10:00 AM ET. This market will resolve to "Astralis" if Astralis win the match against MIBR. This market will resolve to "MIBR" if MIBR win the match against Astralis. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or ends in a tie, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match is postponed, it must be rescheduled to a start time on or before October 30, 2026 at 11:59 PM ET (14 calendar days after the originally scheduled start of October 16, 2026 at 10:00 AM ET). If, by that deadline, the most recently announced rescheduled start time is on or before the deadline, this market resolves based on the result of the match as played. Otherwise, this market resolves 50-50, regardless of whether the match is subsequently played. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://hltv.org. However, if https://hltv.org has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.