Price history
Loading price history...
Counter-Strike: Copenhagen Wolves vs VP.Future 3 (BO3) - European Pro League Regular Playoffs
Event stats
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
Markets
15
Market highlights
Top market
Δ 24h gainer
Δ 24h loser
Highest volume
Top market
Δ 24h gainer
Δ 24h loser
Highest volume
Related events
Counter-Strike: Team Falcons vs NIP (BO3) - Thunderpick World Championship Group ACounter-Strike: Liquid vs BBL (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat III Group BCounter-Strike: 9z vs Aurora Gaming (BO3) - Thunderpick World Championship Group ACounter-Strike: 100 Thieves vs JiJieHao (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat III Group BCounter-Strike: MTX vs Privateer Gaming (BO1) - ESEA Advanced Europe Regular SeasonCounter-Strike: MIBR vs BC.Game Esports (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat III Group DCounter-Strike: Astralis vs Sashi Esport (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat III Group CCounter-Strike: Legacy vs PARIVISION (BO3) - Thunderpick World Championship Group BCounter-Strike: MARTYRDOM vs Rooster (BO3) - ESL Challenger League Oceania Cup #3 PlayoffsCounter-Strike: Sökerorg vs MOUZ NXT (BO3) - European Pro League Regular Group B
Markets
Outcome | Odds | Spread | Δ 24h | Δ 7d | Δ 30d | 24h Volume | Total Volume | Liquidity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map 1 Winner | Copenhagen Wolves | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Winner | Copenhagen Wolves | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Match Winner | Copenhagen Wolves | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| O/U 2.5 Games | Under | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map Handicap: CW (-1.5) vs VP.Future 3 (+1.5) | Copenhagen Wolves | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Copenhagen Wolves (-3.5) vs VP.Future 3 (+3.5) | VP.Future 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Copenhagen Wolves (-3.5) vs VP.Future 3 (+3.5) | Copenhagen Wolves | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: Copenhagen Wolves (-3.5) vs VP.Future 3 (+3.5) | Copenhagen Wolves | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | Under | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Copenhagen Wolves (-6.5) vs VP.Future 3 (+6.5) | VP.Future 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | Under | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Copenhagen Wolves (-6.5) vs VP.Future 3 (+6.5) | VP.Future 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rules
This market refers to the Counter-Strike Upper Bracket Quarterfinal 1 match between Copenhagen Wolves and VP.Future 3 in the European Pro League Regular Playoffs, initially scheduled for October 13, 2026 at 4:00 AM ET. This market will resolve to "Copenhagen Wolves" if Copenhagen Wolves win the match against VP.Future 3. This market will resolve to "VP.Future 3" if VP.Future 3 win the match against Copenhagen Wolves. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or ends in a tie, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match is postponed, it must be rescheduled to a start time on or before October 27, 2026 at 11:59 PM ET (14 calendar days after the originally scheduled start of October 13, 2026 at 4:00 AM ET). If, by that deadline, the most recently announced rescheduled start time is on or before the deadline, this market resolves based on the result of the match as played. Otherwise, this market resolves 50-50, regardless of whether the match is subsequently played. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://hltv.org. However, if https://hltv.org has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.