Price history
Select outcomes to plot.
Counter-Strike: HOTU vs Black Phoenix (BO3) - Moscow Cyber Games European Qualifier Group Stage
Event stats
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
Markets
17
Market highlights
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Related events
Counter-Strike: BET-M 33 vs HyperSpirit (BO3) - NODWIN Clutch Series Group StageCounter-Strike: Nuclear TigeRES vs FORZE Reload (BO3) - Moscow Cyber Games European Qualifier Group StageCounter-Strike: CYBERSHOKE Prospects vs ex-Zero Tenacity (BO3) - NODWIN Clutch Series Group StageCounter-Strike: INOX Division vs Butterfly (BO3) - NODWIN Clutch Series Group StageCounter-Strike: ECHO vs CYBERSHOKE Esports (BO1) - IEM Beijing: Global Open Qualifier PlayoffsCounter-Strike: The Huns Esports vs Vitalem Aerem (BO3) - Moscow Cyber Games Asian Qualifier Group ACounter-Strike: 100 Thieves vs INOX Division (BO1) - IEM Beijing: Global Open Qualifier PlayoffsCounter-Strike: GenOne vs Leo Team (BO3) - NODWIN Clutch Series Group StageCounter-Strike: MASONIC vs HyperSpirit (BO3) - CCT Europe Series #7 Group StageCounter-Strike: Aurora Gaming vs G2 (BO3) - BLAST Open Porto Group A
Markets
Outcome | Odds | Spread | 24h Change | 24h Volume | Total Volume | Liquidity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map 1 Winner | HOTU | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Winner | HOTU | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Match Winner | HOTU | — | — | — | — | — | |
| O/U 2.5 Games | Under | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map Handicap: HOTU (-1.5) vs Black Phoenix (+1.5) | HOTU | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: HOTU (-3.5) vs Black Phoenix (+3.5) | HOTU | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: HOTU (-3.5) vs Black Phoenix (+3.5) | HOTU | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: HOTU (-3.5) vs Black Phoenix (+3.5) | HOTU | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | Under | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: HOTU (-6.5) vs Black Phoenix (+6.5) | HOTU | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | Under | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: HOTU (-9.5) vs Black Phoenix (+9.5) | Black Phoenix | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | Under | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: HOTU (-6.5) vs Black Phoenix (+6.5) | Black Phoenix | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 18.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: HOTU (-9.5) vs Black Phoenix (+9.5) | Black Phoenix | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — |
Rules
This market refers to the Counter-Strike Round 2 match between HOTU and Black Phoenix in the Moscow Cyber Games European Qualifier Group Stage, initially scheduled for August 24, 2026 at 8:00 AM ET. This market will resolve to "HOTU" if HOTU win the match against Black Phoenix. This market will resolve to "Black Phoenix" if Black Phoenix win the match against HOTU. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or ends in a tie, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match is postponed, it must be rescheduled to a start time on or before September 7, 2026 at 11:59 PM ET (14 calendar days after the originally scheduled start of August 24, 2026 at 8:00 AM ET). If, by that deadline, the most recently announced rescheduled start time is on or before the deadline, this market resolves based on the result of the match as played. Otherwise, this market resolves 50-50, regardless of whether the match is subsequently played. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://hltv.org. However, if https://hltv.org has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.