Price history
Select outcomes to plot.
Counter-Strike: illwill vs 100 Thieves (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2: Closed Qualifier Playoffs
Description
Counter-Strike: illwill vs 100 Thieves is a BO3 in the Stake Ranked Episode 2 Closed Qualifier Playoffs, originally scheduled for May 2 at 11:00 AM ET. Illwill wins if they take the series; 100 Thieves wins if they claim the series. If the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond seven days without a winner, the market resolves to a 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed and a team advances due to forfeiture, the winner is the advancing team; a pre-match forfeit results in 50-50. Final results are based on HLTV.org reporting, with credible reporting as fallback within two hours of the match conclusion.
Event stats
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
Markets
12
Market highlights
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Related events
Counter-Strike: FaZe vs FURIA (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Group BCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs GamerLegion (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Group BCounter-Strike: Prestige vs BIG Academy (BO3) - European Pro League Regular PlayoffsCounter-Strike: Fire Flux Esports vs BIG Academy (BO3) - United21 PlayoffsCounter-Strike: Damajuana vs Players (BO3) - CCT South America Series #1 Group StageCounter-Strike: Fake do Biru vs ShindeN (BO3) - ESL Challenger League South America Cup #4 PlayoffsCounter-Strike: FarmVille vs shimmer (BO3) - Thunderpick World Championship North American Group ACounter-Strike: Isurus vs Bounty Hunters Esports (BO3) - ESL Challenger League South America Cup #4 PlayoffsCounter-Strike: eternal premium vs Glitchtech Esports (BO1) - ESEA Advanced Europe Regular SeasonCounter-Strike: BESTIA Academy vs FURIA fe (BO3) - CCT South America Series #1 Group Stage
Markets
Outcome | Odds | Spread | 24h Change | 24h Volume | Total Volume | Liquidity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match Winner | 100 Thieves | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Winner | illwill | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Winner | 100 Thieves | — | — | — | — | — | |
| O/U 2.5 Games | Over | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map Handicap: 100T (-1.5) vs illwill (+1.5) | illwill | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | Odd | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Odd/Even Total Rounds | Even | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | Odd | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Odd/Even Total Rounds | Even | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | Odd | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Odd/Even Total Rounds | Odd | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map Handicap: ILWL (-1.5) vs 100 Thieves (+1.5) | 100 Thieves | — | — | — | — | — |
Rules
This market refers to the Counter-Strike Round 2 match between illwill and 100 Thieves in the Stake Ranked Episode 2: Closed Qualifier Playoffs, initially scheduled for May 2 at 11:00AM ET. This market will resolve to "illwill" if illwill win the match against 100 Thieves. This market will resolve to "100 Thieves" if 100 Thieves win the match against illwill. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://hltv.org. However, if https://hltv.org has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.