Price history
Loading price history...
Event stats
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
Markets
12
Market highlights
Top market
Δ 24h gainer
Δ 24h loser
Highest volume
Top market
Δ 24h gainer
Δ 24h loser
Highest volume
Related events
Counter-Strike: Heroic vs Sangal (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat II PlayoffsCounter-Strike: paiN vs Galorys (BO3) - FERJEE In House PlayoffsCounter-Strike: mellren vs megoshort (BO3) - CCT Europe Closed Qualifier: Series #10 Group BCounter-Strike: Team Nemesis vs Sashi Esport (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 5: Closed Qualifier PlayoffsCounter-Strike: magic vs GamerLegion (BO3) - 1win Private Club #1 PlayoffsCounter-Strike: Walczaki vs BET-M 33 (BO3) - NODWIN Clutch Series PlayoffsCounter-Strike: FOKUS vs SPARTA (BO3) - NODWIN Clutch Series PlayoffsCounter-Strike: Sinners vs NIP (BO3) - 1win Private Club #1 PlayoffsCounter-Strike: Imperial vs Bounty Hunters Esports (BO3) - FERJEE In House PlayoffsCounter-Strike: The Huns Esports vs Kaleido Gaming (BO3) - ESL Challenger League Asia-Pacific Cup #2 Playoffs
Markets
Outcome | Odds | Spread | Δ 24h | Δ 7d | Δ 30d | 24h Volume | Total Volume | Liquidity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map 1 Winner | METANOIA WOLVES | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Winner | METANOIA WOLVES | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Match Winner | METANOIA WOLVES | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| O/U 2.5 Games | Under | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map Handicap: MW (-1.5) vs MIBR fe (+1.5) | METANOIA WOLVES | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: METANOIA WOLVES (-3.5) vs MIBR fe (+3.5) | METANOIA WOLVES | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: METANOIA WOLVES (-3.5) vs MIBR fe (+3.5) | MIBR fe | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: METANOIA WOLVES (-3.5) vs MIBR fe (+3.5) | MIBR fe | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: METANOIA WOLVES (-6.5) vs MIBR fe (+6.5) | MIBR fe | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: METANOIA WOLVES (-6.5) vs MIBR fe (+6.5) | MIBR fe | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rules
This market refers to the Counter-Strike Round 3 match between METANOIA WOLVES and MIBR fe in the CCT South America Series 6 Group Stage, initially scheduled for September 27, 2026 at 12:00 PM ET. This market will resolve to "METANOIA WOLVES" if METANOIA WOLVES win the match against MIBR fe. This market will resolve to "MIBR fe" if MIBR fe win the match against METANOIA WOLVES. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or ends in a tie, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match is postponed, it must be rescheduled to a start time on or before October 11, 2026 at 11:59 PM ET (14 calendar days after the originally scheduled start of September 27, 2026 at 12:00 PM ET). If, by that deadline, the most recently announced rescheduled start time is on or before the deadline, this market resolves based on the result of the match as played. Otherwise, this market resolves 50-50, regardless of whether the match is subsequently played. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://hltv.org. However, if https://hltv.org has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.