Price history
Select outcomes to plot.
Description
Counter-Strike: NIP vs K27 in Stake Ranked Episode 3 Playoffs is a BO3 Upper Bracket Quarterfinal scheduled for July 15 at 6:00 AM ET. NIP wins the match to resolve the market; K27 wins if they take the series. If the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or no result within seven days, the market resolves 50-50. For partial play, forfeiture, or walkovers, the winner’s market resolves accordingly; full forfeits resolve to 50-50. Final resolution follows HLTV.org reporting or credible consensus if needed.
Event stats
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
Markets
17
Market highlights
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Related events
Counter-Strike: TYLOO vs 9z (BO3) - XSE Pro League PlayoffsCounter-Strike: Alliance vs Team Nemesis (BO3) - XSE Pro League PlayoffsCounter-Strike: Inner Circle Esports vs GenOne (BO3) - RES Showdown Europe PlayoffsCounter-Strike: Virtus.pro vs NIP (BO3) - RES Showdown Europe PlayoffsCounter-Strike: B8 vs Sangrija (BO3) - RES Showdown Europe PlayoffsCounter-Strike: FaZe vs BetBoom Team (BO3) - XSE Pro League PlayoffsCounter-Strike: METANOIA WOLVES vs MIBR Academy (BO3) - Thunderpick World Championship South American Series #2 Group BCounter-Strike: Yawara Esports vs Keyd (BO3) - Thunderpick World Championship South American Series #2 Group BCounter-Strike: Imperial vs largadosypelados (BO3) - CCT South America Series 3 PlayoffsCounter-Strike: Isurus vs Fake do Biru (BO3) - Thunderpick World Championship South American Series #2 Group A
Markets
Outcome | Odds | Spread | 24h Change | 24h Volume | Total Volume | Liquidity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map 1 Winner | NIP | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Winner | NIP | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Match Winner | NIP | — | — | — | — | — | |
| O/U 2.5 Games | Under | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map Handicap: NIP (-1.5) vs K27 (+1.5) | NIP | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | Under | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | Under | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: K27 (-3.5) vs NIP (+3.5) | NIP | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | Under | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map Handicap: K27 (-1.5) vs NIP (+1.5) | NIP | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: NIP (-6.5) vs K27 (+6.5) | K27 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: NIP (-3.5) vs K27 (+3.5) | NIP | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: K27 (-6.5) vs NIP (+6.5) | NIP | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: NIP (-3.5) vs K27 (+3.5) | NIP | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: NIP (-6.5) vs K27 (+6.5) | K27 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | Under | — | — | — | — | — |
Rules
This market refers to the Counter-Strike Upper Bracket Quarterfinals 4 match between NIP and K27 in the Stake Ranked Episode 3 Playoffs, initially scheduled for July 15 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to "NIP" if NIP win the match against K27. This market will resolve to "K27" if K27 win the match against NIP. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://hltv.org. However, if https://hltv.org has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.