Price history
Select outcomes to plot.
Counter-Strike: Sharks vs 100 Thieves (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2: Closed Qualifier Playoffs
Description
Counter-Strike: Sharks vs 100 Thieves in Stake Ranked Episode 2’s Closed Qualifier Playoffs is a BO3 scheduled for May 3 at 11:00 AM ET. Sharks or 100 Thieves will win the match based on the final result; if the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond seven days without a winner, the market resolves 50-50. If a team forfeits after starting, the final winner resolves in favor of the remaining team; if the match ends in a forfeit before start, the market resolves 50-50. Final results come from HLTV.org, or a credible-reporting consensus if HLTV.org is not published within two hours of conclusion.
Event stats
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
Markets
12
Market highlights
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Related events
Counter-Strike: Vitality vs GamerLegion (BO3) - BLAST Rivals PlayoffsCounter-Strike: NeverPlay vs VP.Future (BO3) - Exort Series Contenders StageCounter-Strike: Zomblers vs InControl (BO3) - Thunderpick World Championship North American PlayoffsCounter-Strike: BESTIA Academy vs Alzon (BO3) - CCT South America Series #1 Group StageCounter-Strike: Sharks vs BET-M 33 (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2: Closed Qualifier PlayoffsCounter-Strike: Johnny Speeds vs Infinite (BO3) - Esplay Elite Gaming PlayoffsCounter-Strike: Turma do Pagode vs Bounty Hunters Esports (BO3) - Odyssey Cup Brazil Group StageCounter-Strike: Voca vs Zomblers (BO3) - ESL Challenger League North America Cup #4 PlayoffsCounter-Strike: G2 Ares vs Lilmix (BO3) - Esplay Elite Gaming PlayoffsCounter-Strike: Fire Flux Esports vs LPH Gaming (BO3) - United21 Playoffs
Markets
Outcome | Odds | Spread | 24h Change | 24h Volume | Total Volume | Liquidity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match Winner | Sharks | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Winner | Sharks | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Winner | Sharks | — | — | — | — | — | |
| O/U 2.5 Games | Under | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map Handicap: 100T (-1.5) vs Sharks (+1.5) | Sharks | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | Odd | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Odd/Even Total Rounds | Even | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | Even | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Odd/Even Total Rounds | Odd | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | Odd | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Odd/Even Total Rounds | Odd | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map Handicap: SHK (-1.5) vs 100 Thieves (+1.5) | Sharks | — | — | — | — | — |
Rules
This market refers to the Counter-Strike Round 3 match between Sharks and 100 Thieves in the Stake Ranked Episode 2: Closed Qualifier Playoffs, initially scheduled for May 3 at 11:00AM ET. This market will resolve to "Sharks" if Sharks win the match against 100 Thieves. This market will resolve to "100 Thieves" if 100 Thieves win the match against Sharks. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://hltv.org. However, if https://hltv.org has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.