Price history
Select outcomes to plot.
Event stats
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
Markets
20
Market highlights
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Related events
Dota 2: Team Synapse vs Nemiga Gaming (BO3) - EPL Masters Play-In Group ADota 2: Team Lynx vs Team Syntax (BO3) - EPL Masters Play-In Group BDota 2: DYNASTY vs Inner Circle (BO3) - EPL Masters Play-In Group ADota 2: RE.Arise vs summer bear (BO3) - EPL Masters Play-In Group BDota 2: Klim Sani4 vs RE.Arise (BO3) - EPL Masters Play-In Group BDota 2: FTS vs Nemiga Gaming (BO3) - EPL Masters Play-In Group ADota 2: Team Syntax vs Spirit Academy (BO3) - EPL Masters Play-In Group BDota 2: Team Synapse vs FTS (BO3) - EPL Masters Play-In Group ADota 2: Winter Bear vs strongboys (BO3) - European Pro League Group BDota 2: Aurora vs Zero Tenacity (BO3) - DreamLeague Division 2 Playoffs
Markets
Outcome | Odds | Spread | 24h Change | 24h Volume | Total Volume | Liquidity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Game 1 Winner | Inner Circle | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Game 2 Winner | Inner Circle | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Match Winner | Inner Circle | — | — | — | — | — | |
| O/U 2.5 Games | Under | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Game Handicap: ICxI (-1.5) vs PuckChamp (+1.5) | Inner Circle | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Ends in Daytime | Yes | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Both Teams Beat Roshan | No | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Both Teams Destroy Barracks | No | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Any Player Ultra Kill | No | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Any Player Rampage | No | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Ends in Daytime | No | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Both Teams Beat Roshan | No | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Both Teams Destroy Barracks | No | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Any Player Ultra Kill | No | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Any Player Rampage | No | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Ends in Daytime | Yes | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Both Teams Beat Roshan | Yes | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Both Teams Destroy Barracks | Yes | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Any Player Ultra Kill | Yes | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Any Player Rampage | Yes | — | — | — | — | — |
Rules
This market refers to the Dota 2 match between PuckChamp and Inner Circle in the EPL Masters Play-In Group A, initially scheduled for August 28, 2026 at 3:00 AM ET. This market will resolve to "PuckChamp" if PuckChamp win the match against Inner Circle. This market will resolve to "Inner Circle" if Inner Circle win the match against PuckChamp. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or ends in a tie, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match is postponed, it must be rescheduled to a start time on or before September 11, 2026 at 11:59 PM ET (14 calendar days after the originally scheduled start of August 28, 2026 at 3:00 AM ET). If, by that deadline, the most recently announced rescheduled start time is on or before the deadline, this market resolves based on the result of the match as played. Otherwise, this market resolves 50-50, regardless of whether the match is subsequently played. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://www.dotabuff.com. However, if https://www.dotabuff.com has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.