Price history
Select outcomes to plot.
Dota 2: Virtus.pro vs Zero Tenacity (BO3) - DreamLeague Western Europe Closed Qualifier Playoffs
Description
Virtus.pro vs Zero Tenacity in the DreamLeague Western Europe Closed Qualifier Playoffs is an upper-bracket BO3 scheduled for April 12 at 10:00 AM ET. The match resolves to Virtus.pro if they win; to Zero Tenacity if they win. If the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days with no winner, the market resolves 50-50. If a forfeit or walkover occurs after the match begins, the winner is the remaining team; if the match is a pre-game forfeit, the market resolves 50-50. Resolution sources come from dotabuff, with credible reporting as fallback after 2 hours post-conclusion.
Event stats
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
Markets
72
Market highlights
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Markets
Rules
This market refers to the Dota 2 Upper bracket round 1 match between Virtus.pro and Zero Tenacity in the DreamLeague Western Europe Closed Qualifier Playoffs, initially scheduled for April 12 at 10:00AM ET. This market will resolve to "Virtus.pro" if Virtus.pro win the match against Zero Tenacity. This market will resolve to "Zero Tenacity" if Zero Tenacity win the match against Virtus.pro. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://www.dotabuff.com. However, if https://www.dotabuff.com has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.