Price history
Select outcomes to plot.
Description
Ayumi Miyamoto vs Gaeul Jang in ITF Sapporo is scheduled for June 26, 2026 at 10:15 PM ET. The market resolves to the advancing player based on the match result, or to 50-50 if the match is canceled, ends in a tie, delayed beyond seven days without a winner, or a walkover occurs. Resolution relies on official ITF information, with credible reporting as a fallback.
Event stats
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
Markets
15
Market highlights
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Related events
Lexus Eastbourne Open: Zizou Bergs vs Toby SamuelLexus Eastbourne Open: Tatjana Maria vs Jelena OstapenkoPiracicaba: Valerio Aboian vs Hernan CasanovaPiracicaba: Matias Soto vs Gonzalo VillanuevaPiracicaba: Paulo Dos Santos vs Matheus Pucinelli de AlmeidaITF Bakio: Oscar Weightman vs Sergi Perez ContriPiracicaba: Nicolas Kicker vs Nicolas ZanellatoITF Rome: Sahaja Yamalapalli vs Savannah BroadusITF Rome: Ariana Arseneault vs Jo-Yee ChanITF Rome: Ena Koike vs Ayana Akli
Markets
Rules
This market refers to the tennis match between Ayumi Miyamoto and Gaeul Jang in the ITF Women Sapporo, originally scheduled for June 26, 2026 at 10:15PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Ayumi Miyamoto' if Ayumi Miyamoto advances against Gaeul Jang. This market will resolve to 'Gaeul Jang' if Gaeul Jang advances against Ayumi Miyamoto. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.