Price history
Select outcomes to plot.
Event stats
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
Markets
19
Market highlights
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Related events
Valorant: Gentle Mates vs Eintracht Frankfurt (BO3) - VCT EMEA Play-InsValorant: Team Liquid Brazil vs Evils of Delusion (BO3) - VCT Game Changers Brazil Final Stage PlayoffsValorant: Evil Geniuses GC vs Arashi GC (BO3) - VCT Game Changers Brazil Final Stage PlayoffsValorant: Joblife vs Pcific Esports (BO3) - VCT EMEA Play-InsValorant: FUT Esports vs Eternal Fire (BO3) - VCT EMEA Play-InsValorant: All Gamers vs TEC Esports (BO3) - VCT China Stage 2 Play-InsValorant: MYVRA GC vs FUSION X (BO3) - VCT Game Changers Latin America North Main Event PlayoffsValorant: Team Envy vs M80 (BO3) - VCT Americas Stage 2 Play-InValorant: KRÜ Esports vs BESTIA (BO3) - VCT Americas Stage 2 Play-InValorant: KRÜ Blaze vs Looking For Laburo (BO3) - VCT Game Changers Latin America South Main Event Playoffs
Markets
Outcome | Odds | Spread | 24h Change | 24h Volume | Total Volume | Liquidity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map 1 Winner | Trace Esports | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Winner | Trace Esports | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Match Winner | Trace Esports | — | — | — | — | — | |
| O/U 2.5 Games | Under | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map Handicap: JDG (-1.5) vs Trace Esports (+1.5) | Trace Esports | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: JD Gaming (-2.5) vs Trace Esports (+2.5) | Trace Esports | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 20.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 22.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: JD Gaming (-2.5) vs Trace Esports (+2.5) | Trace Esports | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | Under | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 22.5 | Under | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 20.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 22.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 20.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: JD Gaming (-2.5) vs Trace Esports (+2.5) | JD Gaming | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 19.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map Handicap: TE (-1.5) vs JD Gaming (+1.5) | Trace Esports | — | — | — | — | — |
Rules
This market refers to the Valorant Lower bracket final match between JD Gaming and Trace Esports in the VCT China Stage 2 Play-Ins, initially scheduled for August 12 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to "JD Gaming" if JD Gaming win the match against Trace Esports. This market will resolve to "Trace Esports" if Trace Esports win the match against JD Gaming. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://vlr.gg. However, if https://vlr.gg has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.