Price history
Select outcomes to plot.
Event stats
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
Markets
17
Market highlights
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Related events
Valorant: Gen.G Esports vs T1 (BO3) - VCT Pacific PlayoffsValorant: FUT Esports vs Team Liquid (BO5) - VCT EMEA PlayoffsValorant: FURIA Esports vs G2 Esports (BO3) - VCT Americas Stage 2 PlayoffsValorant: Gentle Mates GC vs G2 Gozen (BO5) - VCT Game Changers EMEA PlayoffsValorant: MIBR vs Evil Geniuses (BO3) - VCT Americas Stage 2 PlayoffsValorant: Nongshim RedForce vs Global Esports (BO3) - VCT Pacific PlayoffsValorant: Team RA'AD vs Vibranium Esports (BO3) - VCL MENA: Resilience Kickoff Group Stage - NAValorant: Ramboot Club vs FALKE ESPORTS (BO2) - VCL Spain: Rising Regular SeasonValorant: Nobles vs yung (BO3) - VCL MENA: Resilience Kickoff Group Stage - MEValorant: Mayhem vs yung (BO3) - VCL MENA: Resilience Kickoff Group Stage - ME
Markets
Outcome | Odds | Spread | 24h Change | 24h Volume | Total Volume | Liquidity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map 1 Winner | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Winner | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Match Winner | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| O/U 2.5 Games | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map Handicap: NRG (-1.5) vs 100 Thieves (+1.5) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: NRG (-2.5) vs 100 Thieves (+2.5) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 22.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 20.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: NRG (-2.5) vs 100 Thieves (+2.5) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 20.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 22.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 20.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 22.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: NRG (-2.5) vs 100 Thieves (+2.5) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rules
This market refers to the Valorant Upper bracket final match between NRG and 100 Thieves in the VCT Americas Stage 2 Playoffs, initially scheduled for September 4, 2026 at 1:00 PM ET. This market will resolve to "NRG" if NRG win the match against 100 Thieves. This market will resolve to "100 Thieves" if 100 Thieves win the match against NRG. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or ends in a tie, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match is postponed, it must be rescheduled to a start time on or before September 18, 2026 at 11:59 PM ET (14 calendar days after the originally scheduled start of September 4, 2026 at 1:00 PM ET). If, by that deadline, the most recently announced rescheduled start time is on or before the deadline, this market resolves based on the result of the match as played. Otherwise, this market resolves 50-50, regardless of whether the match is subsequently played. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://vlr.gg. However, if https://vlr.gg has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.