Price history
Select outcomes to plot.
Description
Brescia: Sarah Rakotomanga vs Mia Ristic is a WTA tennis match scheduled for June 17, 2026 at 4:30 AM ET. The market resolves to the winner of the match based on who advances; if the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond seven days without a winner, it settles 50-50. The primary resolution source is official WTA Tour information, with credible reporting as a fallback.
Event stats
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
Markets
16
Market highlights
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Top market
24h gainer
24h loser
Highest volume
Related events
HSBC Championships: Alex de Minaur vs Gabriel DialloHSBC Championships: Ugo Humbert vs Marin CilicHSBC Championships: Arthur Rinderknech vs Hamad MedjedovicNottingham Open: Viktorija Golubic vs Sofia KeninHalle Open: Tomas Etcheverry vs Daniil MedvedevGrass Court Championships: Suzan Lamens vs Paula BadosaNottingham Open: Caty McNally vs Antonia RuzicHSBC Championships: Rinky Hijikata vs Alejandro TabiloITF Gyula: Sam Ryan Ziegann vs Stefan SeifertBrescia: Ane Mintegi Del Olmo vs Xiaodi You
Markets
Rules
This market refers to the tennis match between Sarah Rakotomanga and Mia Ristic in the Brescia, originally scheduled for June 17, 2026 at 4:30AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Sarah Rakotomanga' if Sarah Rakotomanga advances against Mia Ristic. This market will resolve to 'Mia Ristic' if Mia Ristic advances against Sarah Rakotomanga. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.