Description
Completed match? resolves as Yes if a definitive result exists on ESPNcricinfo; otherwise, if the match ends without a winner or is abandoned, resolves to No.
Price history
Loading price history...
Market stats
Odds
24h change
7D change
—
30D change
—
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
All-time high
—
All-time low
—
Created
Jun 4, 2026, 16:11
Resolve date
Jun 7, 2026, 19:26
Position in event
Odds rank
24h volume rank
24h move rank
Status
Resolved
Parent event
Market Outcomes
Outcome | Odds | Spread | 24h Change | 24h Volume | Total Volume | Liquidity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T20 Blast: Middlesex vs Essex | Essex | — | — | — | — | — | |
| T20 Blast: Middlesex vs Essex - Who wins the toss? | Middlesex | — | — | — | — | — | |
| T20 Blast: Middlesex vs Essex - Completed match? | Yes | — | — | — | — | — |
Event Rules
This market refers to the cricket match between Middlesex and Essex scheduled for June 7 2026 in T20 Blast. This market resolves according to the finalized match result as published by https://www.espncricinfo.com/. DLS/DRS, over-rate penalties, forfeit/walkover, or any other on-field ruling that leads the competition to declare a winner are treated as ordinary wins. If the match ends tied and the playing conditions provide an on-field tiebreak (e.g., Super Over), the winner determined by that tiebreak will be used for resolution. If the match ends tied and no on-field tiebreak is used or available under the playing conditions (e.g., group-stage ODI with no Super Over), the market will resolve 50-50. If the match is postponed/rescheduled, the market remains open until the listed fixture is completed. If the match is permanently canceled or abandoned or otherwise is completed without a winner, the market resolves 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.