Description
O/U 2.5 Games: The match will produce either 3 or 2 or fewer games; settles Yes if the BO3 goes to three maps, and No if it ends in two maps (or fewer). Resolution uses final match length; HLTV or credible reporting if needed.
Price history
Loading price history...
Market stats
Odds
24h change
7D change
—
30D change
—
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
All-time high
—
All-time low
—
Created
Feb 24, 2026, 02:02
Resolve date
Feb 25, 2026, 22:46
Position in event
Odds rank
24h volume rank
24h move rank
Status
Resolved
Parent event
Event
Volume
Markets
5
Top market
Market Outcomes
Outcome | Odds | Spread | 24h Change | 24h Volume | Total Volume | Liquidity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match Winner | Ursa | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Winner | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Winner | Ursa | — | — | — | — | — | |
| O/U 2.5 Games | Under | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map Handicap: URSA (-1.5) vs Rebels Gaming (+1.5) | Ursa | — | — | — | — | — |
Event Rules
This market refers to the Counter-Strike match between Rebels Gaming and Ursa in the CCT Europe Closed Qualifier: Series #17 Group D, scheduled for February 25 at 1:00PM ET. This market will resolve to "Rebels Gaming" if Rebels Gaming win the match against Ursa. This market will resolve to "Ursa" if Ursa win the match against Rebels Gaming. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://hltv.org. However, if https://hltv.org has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.