Description
Game 2 winner: LFO No Name to win Game 2 against CAG Osaka, with the same resolution rules as the match and game 1.
Price history
Loading price history...
Market stats
Odds
24h change
7D change
—
30D change
—
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
All-time high
—
All-time low
—
Created
Mar 25, 2026, 23:32
Resolve date
Mar 27, 2026, 15:50
Position in event
Odds rank
24h volume rank
24h move rank
Status
Resolved
Parent event
Event
Volume
Markets
5
Top market
Market Outcomes
Outcome | Odds | Spread | 24h Change | 24h Volume | Total Volume | Liquidity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match Winner | CAG Osaka | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Game 1 Winner | CAG Osaka | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Game 2 Winner | CAG Osaka | — | — | — | — | — | |
| O/U 2.5 Games | Under | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Game Handicap: CAG (-1.5) vs LFO No Name (+1.5) | CAG Osaka | — | — | — | — | — |
Event Rules
This market refers to the Rainbow Six Siege Upper bracket quarterfinal 3 match between LFO No Name and CAG Osaka in the Asia-Pacific League Kickoff: North Playoffs, initially scheduled for March 27 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to "LFO No Name" if LFO No Name win the match against CAG Osaka. This market will resolve to "CAG Osaka" if CAG Osaka win the match against LFO No Name. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://liquipedia.net/rainbowsix/Main_Page. However, if https://liquipedia.net/rainbowsix/Main_Page has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.