Price history
Loading price history...
Event stats
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
Markets
19
Market highlights
Top market
Δ 24h gainer
Δ 24h loser
Highest volume
Top market
Δ 24h gainer
Δ 24h loser
Highest volume
Related events
Valorant: ALTERNATE aTTaX Ruby vs Sissi State Punks (BO3) - THE POKAL PlayoffsValorant: BERG vs GamerZ Esports (BO3) - THE POKAL PlayoffsValorant: RIZON Cherry vs HooK Esport (BO3) - THE POKAL PlayoffsValorant: G2 Esports vs LOUD (BO3) - VCT Americas Stage 2 PlayoffsValorant: Bilibili Gaming vs XLG Gaming (BO3) - China Evolution Series Act 3 PlayoffsValorant: NRG vs 100 Thieves (BO3) - VCT Americas Stage 2 PlayoffsValorant: FlyQuest RED vs Axolotl (BO3) - VCT Game Changers North America PlayoffsValorant: Wolves Esports vs KeepBest Gaming (BO3) - China Evolution Series Act 3 PlayoffsValorant: FunPlus Phoenix vs A Team (BO3) - China Evolution Series Act 3 PlayoffsValorant: VARREL vs T1 (BO3) - VCT Pacific Playoffs
Markets
Outcome | Odds | Spread | Δ 24h | Δ 7d | Δ 30d | 24h Volume | Total Volume | Liquidity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map 1 Winner | JD Gaming | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Winner | JD Gaming | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Match Winner | JD Gaming | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| O/U 2.5 Games | Under | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map Handicap: JDG (-1.5) vs All Gamers (+1.5) | JD Gaming | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: JD Gaming (-2.5) vs All Gamers (+2.5) | JD Gaming | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 22.5 | Under | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: JD Gaming (-2.5) vs All Gamers (+2.5) | JD Gaming | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | Under | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | Under | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 20.5 | Under | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 20.5 | Under | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 22.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: JD Gaming (-2.5) vs All Gamers (+2.5) | JD Gaming | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 22.5 | Under | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 20.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map Handicap: AG (-1.5) vs JD Gaming (+1.5) | JD Gaming | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 19.5 | Over | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rules
This market refers to the Valorant Upper bracket round 1 match between All Gamers and JD Gaming in the China Evolution Series Act 3 Playoffs, initially scheduled for September 6, 2026 at 5:00 AM ET. This market will resolve to "All Gamers" if All Gamers win the match against JD Gaming. This market will resolve to "JD Gaming" if JD Gaming win the match against All Gamers. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or ends in a tie, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match is postponed, it must be rescheduled to a start time on or before September 20, 2026 at 11:59 PM ET (14 calendar days after the originally scheduled start of September 6, 2026 at 5:00 AM ET). If, by that deadline, the most recently announced rescheduled start time is on or before the deadline, this market resolves based on the result of the match as played. Otherwise, this market resolves 50-50, regardless of whether the match is subsequently played. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://vlr.gg. However, if https://vlr.gg has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.