Description
Map Handicap: GDR (-1.5) vs The Rad Syndicate (+1.5) in the March 26 BO3. GDR must win by 2+ maps for Yes; The Rad Syndicate must win or lose by 1 map for Yes/No decisions per standard handicap resolution.
Price history
Loading price history...
Market stats
Odds
24h change
7D change
—
30D change
—
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
All-time high
—
All-time low
—
Created
Mar 26, 2026, 00:32
Resolve date
Mar 26, 2026, 15:55
Position in event
Odds rank
24h volume rank
24h move rank
Status
Resolved
Parent event
Event
Volume
Markets
5
Top market
Market Outcomes
Outcome | Odds | Spread | 24h Change | 24h Volume | Total Volume | Liquidity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match Winner | Gods Reign | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Winner | Gods Reign | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Winner | Gods Reign | — | — | — | — | — | |
| O/U 2.5 Games | Under | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map Handicap: GDR (-1.5) vs The Rad Syndicate (+1.5) | Gods Reign | — | — | — | — | — |
Event Rules
This market refers to the Valorant match between The Rad Syndicate and Gods Reign in the VCL South Asia: Group Stage, initially scheduled for March 26 at 8:30AM ET. This market will resolve to "The Rad Syndicate" if The Rad Syndicate win the match against Gods Reign. This market will resolve to "Gods Reign" if Gods Reign win the match against The Rad Syndicate. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://vlr.gg. However, if https://vlr.gg has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.