Description
Over/Under 2.5 Games in the Trace Esports vs JD Gaming match. Resolves to Yes if the match consists of at least 3 completed maps; otherwise No. Final results per vlr.gg or credible reporting in case of delay.
Price history
Loading price history...
Market stats
Odds
24h change
7D change
—
30D change
—
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
All-time high
—
All-time low
—
Created
Mar 17, 2026, 14:03
Resolve date
Mar 19, 2026, 13:01
Position in event
Odds rank
24h volume rank
24h move rank
Status
Resolved
Parent event
Event
Volume
Markets
5
Top market
Market Outcomes
Outcome | Odds | Spread | 24h Change | 24h Volume | Total Volume | Liquidity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match Winner | JD Gaming | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 1 Winner | JD Gaming | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map 2 Winner | JD Gaming | — | — | — | — | — | |
| O/U 2.5 Games | Under | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Map Handicap: JDG (-1.5) vs Trace Esports (+1.5) | JD Gaming | — | — | — | — | — |
Event Rules
This market refers to the Valorant Quarterfinal 3 match between Trace Esports and JD Gaming in the China Evolution Series Act 1 Playoffs, initially scheduled for March 19 at 5:00AM ET. This market will resolve to "Trace Esports" if Trace Esports win the match against JD Gaming. This market will resolve to "JD Gaming" if JD Gaming win the match against Trace Esports. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://vlr.gg. However, if https://vlr.gg has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.