Description
Vladimir Putin to be insulted publicly by Trump by June 30, 2026. Settles Yes if Trump publicly insults Putin; credibility through reporting.
Price history
Loading price history...
Market stats
Odds
24h change
7D change
—
30D change
—
24h volume
Total volume
Liquidity
All-time high
—
All-time low
—
Created
May 26, 2026, 22:37
Resolve date
Jun 30, 2026, 00:00
Position in event
Odds rank
24h volume rank
24h move rank
Status
Active
Parent event
Market Outcomes
Outcome | Odds | Spread | 24h Change | 24h Volume | Total Volume | Liquidity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tucker Carlson | Yes | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Megyn Kelly | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Candace Owens | Yes | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Alex Jones | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Pope Leo XIV | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Vladimir Putin | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Joe Biden | Yes | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Barack Obama | Yes | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Marjorie Taylor Greene | Yes | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Pam Bondi | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Benjamin Netanyahu | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| J.D. Vance | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Melania Trump | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Xi Jinping | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Keir Starmer | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Viktor Orbán | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Elon Musk | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Jerome Powell | Yes | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Nicolás Maduro | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Zohran Mamdani | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Jimmy Kimmel | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Emmanuel Macron | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Freidrich Merz | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Norah O'Donnell | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Kaitlan Collins | Yes | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Mohammed bin Salman | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Event Rules
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count. A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject. Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies. The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.